Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

Slave cost map project

Per my musings in !9276 (merged), begin tweaking slaveCost() to be a bit more transparent. Right now, all this MR does is allow slaveCostBeauty to return a map. slaveCost() is the only thing that uses slaveCostBeauty(), conveniently, meaning I only had to make one small change there and it returns a number like normal.

However, we could call slaveCostBeauty in a second place, and get the info that map provides:

image

Edited by lowercasedonkey

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
Please register or sign in to reply
Loading